Bu makalenin içeriği michelson morley etrafında dönecektir. michelson morley arıyorsanız, bu michelson morley experiment explained makalesinde michelson morley konusuna açıklık getirelim.

michelson morley experiment explained içindeki michelson morley ile ilgili bilgilerin ayrıntılı bir özeti

Şimdi aşağıdaki videoyu izleyin

Bu BrightPathTutors web sitesi ile kendiniz için daha yararlı verilere sahip olmak için michelson morley dışında bilgi ekleyebilirsiniz. BrightPathTutors web sitesinde, sizin için her gün her gün yeni ve doğru içerik yayınlıyoruz, Sizin için en eksiksiz değere hizmet etme arzusuyla, İnternette olabildiğince çabuk haber yakalayabilmenize yardımcı olun.

Bazı açıklamalar konuyla ilgilidir michelson morley

Bu videoda ünlü Michelson Morley deneyinden bahsediyorum. Parlayan eterin kanıtı arayışında, bu, en ünlü sıfır sonuç deneyi olarak bilinmeye başlandı. O zamanki fizik anlayışıyla tutarsız olsa da, Einstein’ın özel görelilik kuramı bağlamında tamamen anlaşılmıştı. Deneyimi anlamanıza yardımcı olması için bazı yardımcı analojiler kullanacağım. 👍 Bu videoyu gerçekten beğendiniz mi? Mesela ben ne yapıyorum? Bana bir kahve ısmarlayarak beni destekleyin – www.buymeacoffee.com/physicshigh Abone Ol – www.youtube.com/c/physicshigh Daha fazla destek için, beni Patreon’da destekleyin: www.patreon.com/physicshigh BEĞENİN ve akranlarınızla PAYLAŞIN. Ve lütfen size yardımcı olduğumu bildirmek için bir YORUM ekleyin. Fizik Yüksek, fizik kavramlarını bir lise öğrencisinin anlayabileceği düzeyde öğreten içerikler üretmeye çalışmaktadır. Tüm videolarımı ve diğer kaynaklarımı görmek için www.physicshigh.com adresini ziyaret edin. Ek olarak, Deep Impact adlı bir dizi podcast hazırlıyorum: bilim iletişimcileriyle, onları zanaatlarını anlatmaya iten şeyin ne olduğuna dair röportajlar. Bunları kanalda ve ayrıca Spotify, Apple ve Google Podcasts gibi podcast sitelerinde bulabilirsiniz 👥Sosyal ————– —– – ——— – ————————— Facebook’ta beni takip edin: @physicshigh twitter: @physicshigh Instagram: @physicshigh #highschoolphysicsexplanation #physicshigh #ether

michelson morley içeriği ile ilgili bazı fotoğraflar

michelson morley experiment explained

Görüntülediğiniz michelson morley experiment explained hakkında bilgi görüntülemeye ek olarak, Ardından, BrightPath Tutors ‘nin hemen her gün yayınladığı daha fazla bilgiyi arayabilirsiniz.

Daha fazlasını görün

michelson morley ile ilgili bazı öneriler

#michelson #morley #experiment #explained.

michelson morley experiment explained,michelson morley experiment flat earth,michelson-morley experiment,michelson morley experiment,the michelson morley experiment,michelson and morley experiment,michelson,michelson morley,michelson interferometer,morley,theory of special relativity,special relativity,speed of light,ether drag theory,theory of relativity,Flat earth,ether,michelson–morley experiment,michelson-morley experiment explained,luminiferous ether.

michelson morley experiment explained.

michelson morley.

michelson morley hakkındaki bilgilerle BrightPathTutors güncellemeleri, size daha fazla bilgi ve yeni bilgiye sahip olmanıza yardımcı olacağınızı umuyoruz.. michelson morley hakkındaki makaleyi brightpathtutors.org ile izlediğiniz için içtenlikle teşekkür ederiz.

  1. Око Вселенной diyor ki:

    Здравствуйте, Рахмет за лекцию. Большая наука; космология, астрофизика, физика …, держаться всего на одном результате эксперимента. Майкельсона Морли по поиску эфира, но он проделан всего на 50%, и с полученным результатом не спорим. Но эксперимент возможно продолжать делать по новому, и получать  дополнительные результаты. К примеру, на опыте Майкельсона 1881 года  по поиску эфира. Если в нем заменить источник света на источник из мазера. Это повышает результаты и понижает помехи, а работает на частоте радар как у транспортной полиции. Используя этот эксперимент в самом транспорте, возможно определять его скорость, относительно – Доминирующего гравитационного поля земли.

  2. Ghost of the Universe diyor ki:

    Hello. There is a new idea. In Michelson's experiment in 1881 to search for the carrier of light – ether. In the experiment, it is necessary to replace the light source with a maser. With the help of this experiment on transport, it is possible to determine its speed relative to the dominant gravitational field of the Earth. 

    Maser – microwave amplification by stimulate demission of radiation.
    Maser – invented in England in 2018

  3. Dredge diyor ki:

    This experiment is medieval and shows how humans can't observe what should be the obvious. Light doesn't travel, it's just a state of the aether in that place at that given time. It's the same with electricity. They were trying to measure the aether using a state of the aether, 'light'.

  4. Kyle Fagan diyor ki:

    is If the light is faster in the positive x direction wouldn’t it be slower in the negative x direction and wouldn’t that cancel out and still be in phase with the light that moves along the y axis no matter what way the ether wind was oriented I’m not really understanding this

  5. Quantum of space diyor ki:

    Thanks interesting. Hello. The speed of light is constant – Within the framework of the prevailing gravitational field – This assumption can be experimentally confirmed by physical experience: On the surface of the earth along its gravitational field, we fix the speed of light in the fibers of the optical angular gyroscopes, gyroscopes located symmetrically on a special platform and moving along a circle without angular velocity. You need to look at the picture with three optical gyroscopes. Internet request KZ-33869

  6. Change The Mentality diyor ki:

    If there is an ether the light would speed up with the ether when traveling to the first mirror and then slow down against the ether when traveling back resulting in the same speed at the detector whether there is an ether or not.

    Doesn't anyone else see the fundemental flaw in this experiment or am I missing something?

  7. Nicholas Spillett diyor ki:

    I'm not on any side, tbh I'm just diving into the field and learning as I go.

    But this doesn't cover the sagnac experiment results, and the fact that laser gyros in every single plane work.

    As for why this experiment failed, anyone who has studied black holes knows why – in aether based physics they believe that the sun "pull" the aether around itself in a "whirlpool", similar to the egosphere of a relativistic black hole.

    I have a lot more to learn on both sides, but they seem to think that gravity is the incompressible aether being "pulled" into the earth and speeding up as the volume decreases as you approach earth, explaining the behaviour of gravity decreasing with distance as expected.

    If you want to really disprove aether you need to do what nobody else seems to want to do and tackle sagnac.

  8. Dan UBE diyor ki:

    God got his credentials from the greatest intellectuals of history the ancient Greeks.to verify his truth .. not medieval fools of barbarous origins who decided to change science as a religion of superstition … and intentionally went against the ancient model so to politically disconnect science from theology and especially philosophy which was a civil standard

  9. Andronikos Kapsalis diyor ki:

    It's not correct to use the throwing of the ball. I think a better example should have been a sound source , since we know that Galilean relativity works in the case of sound. And it resembles more with Light from the wave perspective.

  10. Matter as Machine diyor ki:

    what I don't understand is how this experiment proves that speed of light does not depend on speed of observer? Source and observer where always stationary relatively to each other in this experiment. So it only proves only that speed of light does not depend on speed of source. And if observer moves With source – of course it gets the same speed.

  11. Adrian Gheorghe diyor ki:

    I deduced that in the case of the interference experiment, with the interferometer in the horizontal plane, the light has exactly the same speed in all directions. This is because light (photons) is coupled with the mass density field of the earth. Field that leaves the substance of the earth and emanates in the space in the immediate vicinity. The coupling of light with the density field of the transparent medium is proved by Fizeau's experiment. Experiment that accurately verifies Fresnel's formula, called partial ether entrainment. Fresnel's formula is easy to find, without any relativistic metaphysics, if the density of light and the density of the environment and the density of the earth are added together. And it is not about the entrainment of the ether, but it is about the variation of the refractive index of the transparent medium, when it is moving (in translation) compared to the situation when it is at rest. The negative term in Fresnel's formula is due to the coupling of light with the density field of the planet. Because he is in solidarity with the planet.

  12. bert wesler diyor ki:

    You Sir, are inflamed boil on the butt of a slug.
    And you wouldn't know real science if it were biting you in the ass:
    Which is is for being such a scientific bolt~!

  13. bert wesler diyor ki:

    Why in the fuck does the aether need to be moving.
    I never thought it would.
    so… the assumption you nonsense is based on is shit from jump~!

  14. Bob Sambo diyor ki:

    Also, the speed of light is NOT constant. It depends on the medium it’s passing through. Therefore if the ether is under more tension the further it is from the earth, then light will travel faster the further one is from earth. Very simple. No Einstein needed.

  15. Bob Sambo diyor ki:

    You are conveniently leaving out the 1925 Michelson- Gale-Pearson Experiment which tested for the rotation of the earth through the ether. And they found a 100% existence of the ether (clocked at 1000 miles per hour). Therefore the ether DOES exist and thus the only option left (which you had dismissed with no justification) is that the earth does not move … something which Einstein, Hawking, Newton, Mach and many other said was perfectly and scientifically an option … just like Tycho Brahe discovered. Therefore, Tycho was right, while Copernicus and Ptolemy were wrong. Oh, and the 1913 Sagnac experiment also proved the existence of the either. Einstein thus concocted Relativity and all sorts of unverifiable things (like time dilation, length contraction, mass increasing with speed, etc.) purely from invented equations not empirical proofs.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir